You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the current behavior
A description of how things are today.
Current behavior is that any Azure resources created in the cluster will be created in the same subscription, we need a way to provision resources across multiple subscriptions to deal with Azure resource limits per subscription (f.e. SQL Server, SQL Database.
Describe the improvement
How should things be changed or improved?
Would like to see the support to be able to specify which subscription a resource could be provisioned in, this would require a managed identity with permissions over the subscriptions and then we would need a way through annotations to specify which subscription we want the resources deployed into, for example in an overflow scenario.
Additional context
Add any other context about the suggested improvement.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ASO already supports deploying resources across multiple subscriptions, by using scoped credentials.
The most usual approach is to create a credential with namespace scope - this will be used for all ASO resources in that cluster namespace. One of the fields in a credential is the AZURE_SUBSCRIPTION for which the credential is to be used (see Credential Format).
Alternatively, you can apply the annotation serviceoperator.azure.com/credential-from to any ASO resource to specify which credential should be used, allowing you to freely distribute resources across multiple subscriptions within a single cluster namespace.
Describe the current behavior
A description of how things are today.
Current behavior is that any Azure resources created in the cluster will be created in the same subscription, we need a way to provision resources across multiple subscriptions to deal with Azure resource limits per subscription (f.e. SQL Server, SQL Database.
Describe the improvement
How should things be changed or improved?
Would like to see the support to be able to specify which subscription a resource could be provisioned in, this would require a managed identity with permissions over the subscriptions and then we would need a way through annotations to specify which subscription we want the resources deployed into, for example in an overflow scenario.
Additional context
Add any other context about the suggested improvement.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: