Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Allow for disasm calls without specifying the size of the buffer #78

Open
nazywam opened this issue Jul 6, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Allow for disasm calls without specifying the size of the buffer #78

nazywam opened this issue Jul 6, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@nazywam
Copy link
Member

nazywam commented Jul 6, 2022

In some cases, we don't actually know how many instruction we want to get.
Instead of passing a VERY_LARGE_NUMBER as the size/instruction count we could actually decode instructions one by one and return an endless iterator.
@nazywam nazywam added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@nazywam