Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

trial run with new inspector + transformer #57

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

msherman64
Copy link
Contributor

@msherman64 msherman64 commented Sep 10, 2024

example info from CHI@UC with the new inspector + transformer. This will allow us to resolve issues before a final merge.

Remaining TODO of necessary info:

  • GPU: Key missing, along with count, model, name, and vendor
  • Infiniband: key missing
  • FPGA: Key missing

Additional information which is inconsistent

  • CPU: clock speed is inconsistent, using current instead of some "standard" speed
  • Infiniband: part of mac address seems to change sometimes
  • Disk: revision is truncated compared to old values
  • Disk: wwn and other info missing from extra_data for nvme drives
  • CPU: Cache is rounded and incorrect for large core counts
  • FPGAs: We have fpga model from pci ids, but not board model
  • Disk: some devices report ATA as the disk vendor
  • Infiniband: link speed missing

@msherman64
Copy link
Contributor Author

some open questions:

for network interfaces, what are the meanings of the following fields, and do we need them?

"bridged": false,
"management": false,
"mounted": true,
"enabled": true,

AFAIK we are currently using enabled to mean that an interface is a valid ironic port?

Copy link
Contributor

@Mark-Powers Mark-Powers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. I'm not sure about those fields, maybe Paul might know. Perhaps we should remove them if there is no documentation or known use case? They would not be useful to our users.

Copy link
Member

@codyhammock codyhammock left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants