move max_supersaturation to namelist #42
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #42 +/- ##
========================================
- Coverage 0.02% 0.02% -0.01%
========================================
Files 22 22
Lines 3527 3530 +3
========================================
Hits 1 1
- Misses 3526 3529 +3
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
@charleskawczynski I wonder what the codecov failure is? |
|
No need to worry about codecov because we have no tests in runtests.jl. We could probably turn it off, but it’ll be useful once we start adding unit tests |
|
bors r+ |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is one step towards moving the microphysics parameters to the namelist, so that we can use the calibration pipeline for those parameters. I have confirmed the results using the rain_model = 'cutoff' are the same after this change. @trontrytel @charleskawczynski Could you please take a look and let me know whether it makes sense? Thanks!