You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
(Potential Future Edge Case: Currently, for loops never show inlay hints, whether or not it's destructured. This issue could be relevant if inlay hints are included with for loops but not the destructured variants.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
i would probably prefer the first one. however i'm still on the fence about inlay hints that don't correspond to valid syntax, which is the case here. (related: #198)
@DetachHead Hm, good question. In the example if you gave both are fine. But, if the list is long (e.g. 5-6+) items, I think it would have to be the first one or it'll be difficult to figure out which one maps to which simply by eye. So, I'd go with the first syntax.
Left my 2c on #198 , imo I just want max info because mouse hovering is annoying esp. for many items; bring to real-life isn't a use-case for me. Not sure whether or not my usage is actually representative of the average user though.
When using destructuring, inlay hints currently don't appear.
related: #349
(Potential Future Edge Case: Currently, for loops never show inlay hints, whether or not it's destructured. This issue could be relevant if inlay hints are included with for loops but not the destructured variants.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: