Adding the right publishers @id and name to JSON-LD output

[coret]

Datasetdescriptions, which are outputted as JSON-LD according to schema:Dataset currently have a publisher property of type schema:Organization and a schema:name. This can be traced back to the following code:

dataverse/src/main/java/edu/harvard/iq/dataverse/DatasetVersion.java

Lines 2021 to 2024 in bef00db

	job.add("publisher", Json.createObjectBuilder()
	.add("@type", "Organization")
	.add("name", installationBrandName)
	);

As an example from datasets on https://datasets.iisg.amsterdam/ you'd see
"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"IISH Data Collection"}

In Linked Data, we like URI's, blank nodes are disliked.
The absence of an @id in the schema:publisher is strange, because schema:creator does have @id's in the GUI we see an identifier:

As the identifier (URI) is already available as data element within Dataverse, can this could be added to the publisher JSON-LD to become:
"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","@id": "https://datasets.iisg.amsterdam/dataverse/IISH","name":"IISH Data Collection"}

Although, are these Dataverse values really an schema:Organization? In this example the organization publishing the data via https://datasets.iisg.amsterdam/dataverse/IISH is the International Institute of Social History with URI http://www.iisg.amsterdam/.

I do see, this name and URI on https://datasets.iisg.amsterdam/dataverse/IISH so I'd imagine these values can be used in the publisher property to become:
"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","@id":"http://www.iisg.amsterdam/","name":"International Institute of Social History"}

[pdurbin]

@coret thanks for opening this issue. I'm not sure why some fields have @id's and some don't.

I'm reminded of what I think is a related discussion about what should be shown in the citation of a dataset. Should it continue to be the name of the installation of Dataverse (e.g. Harvard Dataverse)? Or should it be based on the collection the dataset happens to be in right now (it's possible to move datasets from one collection to another)? I posted some screenshots here: #2297 (comment)

[coret]

@pdurbin in my opinion a Dataverse installation is a means used by an organization, two separate things with different meanings. For the datasetdescription the semantics of the schema:publisher is clear: it should be an organization. I'm no expert on citations, but I think you'd rather have the name of the organization, rather than the name of the means.

Or, maybe you could see the Dataverse Name as the name of a collection (as I see users are doing). But my argument would stay the same for the datasetdescription (organisation, not collectionname). For the citation, a collectionname should be included, of course next to the organization name.