Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Align GEDI_L3 to VEDA notebook guidelines #244

Closed
3 tasks done
Tracked by #240
smk0033 opened this issue Jun 14, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed
3 tasks done
Tracked by #240

Align GEDI_L3 to VEDA notebook guidelines #244

smk0033 opened this issue Jun 14, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@smk0033
Copy link
Contributor

smk0033 commented Jun 14, 2023

EPIC

#240

Description

The GEDI L3 Tutorial notebook should be reviewed using the this guidance and includes the following components:

  1. Style
  2. Rendering Information
  3. Notebook Sections

Acceptance Criteria (Tasks):

  • Style should be consistent with guidance provided
  • Rendering information should be complete and accurate. If there is no author/date information available, consult MAAP leads @wildintellect @abarciauskas-bgse for guidance
  • Ensure notebooks include the recommended standard sections
@smk0033 smk0033 added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jun 14, 2023
@smk0033
Copy link
Contributor Author

smk0033 commented Jun 27, 2023

Brian has gotten me in touch with Kathryn. Once we figure out the format for the raw cell/rendering information, I'll create a PR and this will be ready for review.

@smk0033
Copy link
Contributor Author

smk0033 commented Jun 29, 2023

Will be creating a new PR soon - got feedback from Kathryn on HLS

@smk0033
Copy link
Contributor Author

smk0033 commented Jun 30, 2023

PR: #254

@smk0033
Copy link
Contributor Author

smk0033 commented Jun 30, 2023

Merged

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants