You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@Ryun1 this is counterproductive. if you intend not to allow any new tools/existing tools to start adopting the cip0129, how do you expect a migration ever?
Ryun1
changed the title
DRep IDs - Which CIP to follow?
DRep IDs
Aug 25, 2024
I was not trying to discourage adoption of CIP129,
agreed that would be counterproductive
(I have edited and reworded to attempt to avoid this)
To refocus the discussion,
as it stands Mesh seems to have implemented something close to CIP129,
but to me looks different as it includes a network tag, which isnt present in either standard
What?
Currently
mesh-wallet/browser
seems to be implementing the CIP-129? | Governance Identifiers standardbut Mesh seems to be adding an additional network tag which is not present within CIP129
Extra context
The existing definition for DRep IDs via CIP-105 have seen some adoption in tooling (Cardano CLI, hardware wallets, DBSync, etc).
Was there a choice to go with CIP129 over CIP-105 definitions?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: