Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move divhigh, mulhigh_n and divexact_low from Misc. Add tests. #801

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 19, 2021

Conversation

wbhart
Copy link
Contributor

@wbhart wbhart commented Mar 16, 2021

Let me know if you want these three documented.

Note that there were bugs in these, so Hecke tests may now fail as I have corrected their implementation.

I also sped up the third function using unsafe operators.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 16, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #801 (d8098ef) into master (5067e6b) will increase coverage by 0.15%.
The diff coverage is 94.33%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #801      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.85%   81.01%   +0.15%     
==========================================
  Files          52       52              
  Lines       17779    17797      +18     
==========================================
+ Hits        14375    14418      +43     
+ Misses       3404     3379      -25     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/generic/Misc/Poly.jl 0.00% <ø> (ø)
src/julia/Integer.jl 81.13% <50.00%> (-0.60%) ⬇️
src/generic/Poly.jl 91.99% <96.07%> (+0.25%) ⬆️
src/generic/LaurentSeries.jl 91.54% <0.00%> (-0.44%) ⬇️
src/generic/Fraction.jl 79.06% <0.00%> (-0.20%) ⬇️
src/generic/Matrix.jl 91.26% <0.00%> (-0.16%) ⬇️
src/generic/SparsePoly.jl 27.01% <0.00%> (+0.08%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5067e6b...d8098ef. Read the comment docs.

@thofma
Copy link
Member

thofma commented Mar 17, 2021

Can you rebase? Then we see the downstream tests and also if Hecke is failing.

@wbhart
Copy link
Contributor Author

wbhart commented Mar 17, 2021

Did you already rebase it? It doesn't seem to need rebasing at the moment.

@thofma
Copy link
Member

thofma commented Mar 17, 2021

No, it does not need it, but it would be good if we would do it. Then the downstream will be run that I added in #799.

@wbhart
Copy link
Contributor Author

wbhart commented Mar 17, 2021

Done

@thofma
Copy link
Member

thofma commented Mar 17, 2021

Sorry, but I think your master was not up to date, so it is still missing #799. I tried again doing it myself and I still cannot push directly to your branch. Very strange.

@thofma
Copy link
Member

thofma commented Mar 17, 2021

Ah oops, it is working, thanks. Ignore my last comment.

@wbhart
Copy link
Contributor Author

wbhart commented Mar 17, 2021

Have you tried making yourself a maintainer?

@wbhart
Copy link
Contributor Author

wbhart commented Mar 17, 2021

I did rebase it a second time. Indeed the latest patch wasn't in.

@wbhart
Copy link
Contributor Author

wbhart commented Mar 18, 2021

All the failures here seem to be due to unsatisfiable requirements for package Oscar, which doesn't seem related to this PR.

Any chance it could be merged? Or is there something else I need to do here?

@thofma
Copy link
Member

thofma commented Mar 18, 2021

Yes, this is expected. This is good to go from my part. @fieker?

@thofma thofma merged commit cbb00e1 into Nemocas:master Mar 19, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants