Definition of the benchmarking metrics

[mweidling]

We have identified the following metrics to be relevant for benchmarking:

• Bag of Words
• CER/WER
• Flexible CER
• Reading Order
• IoU
• mAP
• CPU time
• wall time
• I/O
• memory usage

In order for us and our users to be clear what we exactly mean when we use these terms we have to properly define them and add them to the OCR-D specs.

Prior Art: https://pad.gwdg.de/3S_yuzyERum4WQChxV6UyQ
Link to draft: https://pad.gwdg.de/rLDBVhmYQ8CwOd67KcYHwQ#

• define each metric
• add them to the specs

[mweidling]

See https://pad.gwdg.de/rLDBVhmYQ8CwOd67KcYHwQ# for the current status.

[mweidling]

@kba @cneud

My first draft of the metrics is ready. Could you please have a look at them? There are still some open TODOs which indicate points that we should talk about / need to define.

I intentionally left the "scenario based layout evaluation" empty because from what I got from the paper linked this is not a metric in the narrower sense. Maybe we could talk about this as well.

[cneud]

Thank you @mweidling! I've added a new top level and slightly restructured to make the distinction between the evaluation of text, layout and resource utilization more clear, and added some introductory remarks for those sections. Looks very good otherwise, I guess we can have one more call and then publish a first version to spec.

[mweidling]

Thank you for your feedback and work, @cneud ! I'll schedule a call then.