Emit `sa.Enum(...).with_variant(postgresql.ENUM(...))` instead of `postgresql.ENUM(...)` #83

Et7f3 · 2024-08-23T09:54:53Z

Hello,

Thanks for your works.

I know the project is called alembic-postgresql-enum but from outside it seems to be quite generic and in theory could be applied with multiple backend once create_type is added for others dialect.

Main alembic dev suggest this coding style:
sqlalchemy/alembic#1347 (comment)

One advantage I see is that we don't seems locked with postgresql (in the case in the future I need to change to other db).

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

Et7f3 changed the title ~~Can you emit sa.Enum(...).with_variant(postgresql.ENUM(...)) instead of postgresql.ENUM(...)~~ Emit sa.Enum(...).with_variant(postgresql.ENUM(...)) instead of postgresql.ENUM(...) Aug 23, 2024

AlexandrovRoman added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 25, 2024

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Emit `sa.Enum(...).with_variant(postgresql.ENUM(...))` instead of `postgresql.ENUM(...)` #83

Emit `sa.Enum(...).with_variant(postgresql.ENUM(...))` instead of `postgresql.ENUM(...)` #83

Et7f3 commented Aug 23, 2024

Emit sa.Enum(...).with_variant(postgresql.ENUM(...)) instead of postgresql.ENUM(...) #83

Emit sa.Enum(...).with_variant(postgresql.ENUM(...)) instead of postgresql.ENUM(...) #83

Comments

Et7f3 commented Aug 23, 2024

Emit `sa.Enum(...).with_variant(postgresql.ENUM(...))` instead of `postgresql.ENUM(...)` #83

Emit `sa.Enum(...).with_variant(postgresql.ENUM(...))` instead of `postgresql.ENUM(...)` #83