Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Specification of the Redeemer Tag necessary? #177

Closed
nielstron opened this issue Mar 14, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #178
Closed

Specification of the Redeemer Tag necessary? #177

nielstron opened this issue Mar 14, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #178
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@nielstron
Copy link
Contributor

The Redeemer is currently annotated with a tag (SPEND, MINT, etc)

I am wondering if this is necessary? Should this tag not be automatically derived? When building transactions with the CLI, you never specify the tag. I would assume that the tag can be derived automatically depending on the position of its occurrence.

If you agree, I will open a PR that removes the need to specify this tag, reducing the friction for the TxBuilder.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Remove the need to specify the RedeemerTag OpShin/pycardano
2 participants
@nielstron @cffls