Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[5.6.0-beta.1] Support Z-distance feedback: Support thickness of 0.01mm on layer 0 #17393

Open
printingotb opened this issue Nov 21, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
PreRelease 🐛 An issue found in an Alpha or Beta version of a new Release Status: Under Investigation The issue has been confirmed or is assumed to be likely to be a real issue. It's pending discussion. Type: Bug The code does not produce the intended behavior.

Comments

@printingotb
Copy link

Cura Version

5.6.0-beta.1

Operating System

win10

Printer

Custom fff

Reproduction steps

see project. The model is a 10x10x0.2mm square raised 1mm above the buildplate. It has 3 layers of support.
Layer height and initial layer height is 0.2mm. Support Z-distance is 0.39mm

Please also see my other reports submitted at the same time, some are related.

Actual results

The Z coordinate at layer 0 is 0.01. Wrong?
Also, the normal support lines on layer 0 gets reduced like I would expect the topmost support interface layer to be. I assume because it "believes" it's the last layer of support?
Note, I discovered that the extraneous normal support lines disappear when I reduce my support horizontal expansion. I had set it extra high to make testing easier.

Expected results

Z-coordinate on layer 0 should be same as initial layer height?
I believe printing a 0.01mm thick first layer risk damaging the buildplate, especially if the bed is leveled a bit too close to the nozzle. (This is why I moved the support structures upwards in my script-attempt instead of downwards #6105 (comment)).

Add your .zip and screenshots here ⬇️

Layer 0 Z.3mf.zip
layer 0 glitch
layer 0 glitch 2
Layer 0 gcode

@printingotb printingotb added Status: Triage This ticket requires input from someone of the Cura team Type: Bug The code does not produce the intended behavior. labels Nov 21, 2023
@GregValiant GregValiant added Status: Under Investigation The issue has been confirmed or is assumed to be likely to be a real issue. It's pending discussion. and removed Status: Triage This ticket requires input from someone of the Cura team labels Nov 21, 2023
@GregValiant
Copy link
Collaborator

GregValiant commented Nov 21, 2023

BIG EDIT:
Thanks for the report.
When I slice you file I get this at Layer:0 IN CURA 5.5.0
;--------------------------------------
;
G92 E0
G92 E0
G1 F1500 E-0.8
;LAYER_COUNT:6
;LAYER:0
M107
M204 S1333
M205 X5 Y5
G1 F600 Z0.4 >>>>> This is Initial Layer Height of 9.2 + ZHop Height of 0.2
G0 F6000 X103.834 Y103.834 Z0.4
M204 S1000
;TYPE:SUPPORT
G1 F600 Z0.2 >>>>>This is "Hop down"
G1 F1500 E0
G1 F1373 X103.948 Y103.803 E0.00425
G1 F1488.8 X116 Y103.8 E0.40407
and at the beginning of the file is ;MINZ:0.2

In 5.6beta2 I can duplicate this behavior.
;--------------------------------------
;
G92 E0
G92 E0
G1 F1500 E-0.8
;LAYER_COUNT:6
;LAYER:0
M107
M204 S1333
M205 X5 Y5
G1 F600 Z0.21
G0 F6000 X104.2 Y104.2 Z0.21
M204 S1000
;TYPE:SUPPORT-INTERFACE
G1 F600 Z0.01
G1 F1500 E0
G1 X115.8 Y104.2 E0.38196
And the beginning of the file shows: ;MINZ:0.01
@MariMakes this one needs some attention. I am unable to duplicate the behavior with my printer active.

@MariMakes MariMakes added the PreRelease 🐛 An issue found in an Alpha or Beta version of a new Release label Nov 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
PreRelease 🐛 An issue found in an Alpha or Beta version of a new Release Status: Under Investigation The issue has been confirmed or is assumed to be likely to be a real issue. It's pending discussion. Type: Bug The code does not produce the intended behavior.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants