I sort of feel like the default parsing should be <template>, since that can appear anywhere. Definitely not <div>, we don't want to close <p> and such.

[stonerboy410]

I sort of feel like the default parsing should be <template>, since that can appear anywhere. Definitely not <div>, we don't want to close <p> and such.

While <script> has some complexity, it's not clear to me that introducing a new parser class is better than simply reusing the path <script> already takes.

I agree that <template> inertness is a different feature. Inheritance seems reasonable for that, though might also be composition in part since the parser then puts elements elsewhere. And if <template> ever gains data binding you might want all the parsing implications of <template>, but not data binding...

Originally posted by @annevk in #113 (comment)