Components: agree on components classification

[ciampo]

Why

As the components library grow larger, it may beneficial to split (and list) the components into separate groups (e.g. low level, high level, utilities)

What

The "what" will be the outcome of this conversation

A/C

• Agree on components classes (e.g. low level, high level, utilities)
• Potentially create folder structure in the components package
• Update documentation

[mtias]

I'd prefer to avoid any classification for now and retain a flat list. We can introduce some order later on when things decant.

[ciampo]

Make sense. We can continue the conversation here at a later time