You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This isn't really an issue, more of a vague question about it's uses.
After reading the paper, I wonder if there are any low hanging fruit to be capitalized on for increasing the adoptability to measuring affect over time? One of the most exciting improvements between this and the SAM is its easy transfer to digital devices. As wearable tech has now become widely available, what are the main barriers to somehow incorporating the AS to these wearables (glasses, watches, etc)?
Of course the AS still requires voluntary interaction, which is a barrier to over-time measurement. Until affect can be measured passively it seems unlikely for wearables to really be of much use here. Still, the AS could be integral in a possible stepping stone to constant measuring of affect.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This isn't really an issue, more of a vague question about it's uses.
After reading the paper, I wonder if there are any low hanging fruit to be capitalized on for increasing the adoptability to measuring affect over time? One of the most exciting improvements between this and the SAM is its easy transfer to digital devices. As wearable tech has now become widely available, what are the main barriers to somehow incorporating the AS to these wearables (glasses, watches, etc)?
Of course the AS still requires voluntary interaction, which is a barrier to over-time measurement. Until affect can be measured passively it seems unlikely for wearables to really be of much use here. Still, the AS could be integral in a possible stepping stone to constant measuring of affect.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: