Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] Missing compatibility with IntelliJ IDEA 2024.2.0.1 #204

Closed
2 tasks done
camaral opened this issue Aug 21, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by asyncapi/jasyncapi-idea-plugin#104
Closed
2 tasks done
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@camaral
Copy link

camaral commented Aug 21, 2024

Describe the bug.

Not actually a bug, it's just not compatible with the newest version of IntelliJ and I was hoping it would be an easy fix.

Expected behavior

IntelliJ IDEA 2024.2.0.1 allows the installation of the plugin.

Screenshots

Screenshot 2024-08-21 at 14 22 25

How to Reproduce

  1. Install IntelliJ IDEA 2024.2.0.1
  2. Search for the plugin(you will not find it)
  3. If you are logged in to jetbrains, the website shows the compatibility issue https://plugins.jetbrains.com/plugin/15673-asyncapi

🥦 Browser

None

👀 Have you checked for similar open issues?

  • I checked and didn't find similar issue

🏢 Have you read the Contributing Guidelines?

Are you willing to work on this issue ?

None

@camaral camaral added the bug Something isn't working label Aug 21, 2024
Copy link

Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for reporting your first issue. Please check out our contributors guide and the instructions about a basic recommended setup useful for opening a pull request.
Keep in mind there are also other channels you can use to interact with AsyncAPI community. For more details check out this issue.

@Pakisan
Copy link
Member

Pakisan commented Sep 3, 2024

@camaral hi! New version is available

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants