Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unable to build al2/aarch64/standard/2.0 because of old Maven #656

Open
jeffb4 opened this issue Jun 23, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Unable to build al2/aarch64/standard/2.0 because of old Maven #656

jeffb4 opened this issue Jun 23, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@jeffb4
Copy link

jeffb4 commented Jun 23, 2023

Describe the bug
Builds of al2/aarch64/standard/2.0 fail because it references a Maven binary that is no longer available

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Try to build al2/aarch64/standard/2.0
  2. Get checksum mismatch for https://apache.org/dist/maven/maven-3/3.6.3/binaries/apache-maven-3.6.3-bin.tar.gz
  3. Try to download it yourself, get 404
  4. Go to https://apache.org/dist/maven/maven-3/ and discover 3.8.8 is the lowest 3.x version available to download

Expected behavior
I would expect the download to succeed (I think Apache took those older binaries down very recently)

Logs
I think the description is good without logs

Platform (please complete the following information):

  • OS: Linux ARM (build was running in codebuild)

Additional context
No additional context.

@subinataws
Copy link
Contributor

@jeffb4 - Thanks for reporting the issue. Note that the Dockerfiles provided in this repo are meant as a reference for customers to know what's available in the Docker images provided by CodeBuild on AWS Cloud. Since the pre-built docker files are already built and made available on https://gallery.ecr.aws/codebuild/amazonlinux2-aarch64-standard as public.ecr.aws/codebuild/amazonlinux2-aarch64-standard:2.0, please consider using it from there.

We may consider bumping the maven version up on this image in a future release, but for now, we will keep need to keep the Dockerfiles in sync with what the Docker images on AWS CodeBuild were built from.

@jeffb4
Copy link
Author

jeffb4 commented Jul 19, 2023

I would expect, as a customer, someone from the Codebuild image maintenance team to see this GH issue, update whatever private Dockerfile is used internally for building the codebuild image, releasing a new image, and then syncing back to this repo.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants