From b3c105867e65bf0d85eea277f699abf7569eb7fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: azimut Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 20:08:39 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] update todos... add codeblock and embed --- internal/fourchan/TODO.org | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/internal/fourchan/TODO.org b/internal/fourchan/TODO.org index 83ed8bc..8bd96be 100644 --- a/internal/fourchan/TODO.org +++ b/internal/fourchan/TODO.org @@ -1,10 +1,63 @@ -- Type of HTML - - > Green text +- Types of messages + - [ ] Code embed
>>92788773
+ >In the first one, you're passing i a dictionary that matches the keyword arguments of the function, so it works.
+ I see, thank you anon.
+ But....aren't function arguments when declaring it just random words that do not need to fit the names of the variables/objects that will use it?
+ Like, this works:
+
+
a='hello world'
+
+ def fun(qqq):
+ print(qqq)
+
+ fun(a)
+

+
+ It did not matter if i write the argument of the function
def fun(lollmao)
, it can take any variable in it even if it's not called "lollmao", how come now the args need to fit 100% the name of the keys in the dictionary unpacked? + #+end_src + #+begin_src + >>92788773 + >In the first one, you're passing i a dictionary that matches the keyword arguments of the function, so it works. + I see, thank you anon. + But....aren't function arguments when declaring it just random words that do not need to fit the names of the variables/objects that will use it? + Like, this works: + + a='hello world' + + def fun(qqq): + print(qqq) + + fun(a) + + + + It did not matter if i write the argument of the function + + def fun(lollmao) + + , it can take any variable in it even if it's not called "lollmao", how come now the args need to fit 100% the name of the keys in the dictionary unpacked? + #+end_src + - [ ] YT Embed (I ADDED NEW LINE AFTER BR) + #+begin_src html + >>92787439
+ >I like watching Unix history videos
+ here's a good one
+ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tc4ROCJYbm0 + #+end_src + #+begin_src + >>92787439 + >I like watching Unix history videos + here's a good one + https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tc4ROCJYbm0 [Embed] + #+end_src + - [ ] > Green text (missing
?) >move over im gonna make the thread - - Link to Message on the same Thread + - [ ] Link to Message on the same Thread >>92748359 >>92748359
- - Multi-quote on the same Thread, with the same message (I ADDED THE NEW LINES AFTER br) + - [ ] Multi-quote on the same Thread, with the same message (I ADDED THE NEW LINES AFTER br) #+begin_src html >>92772863
>>92773151
@@ -14,7 +67,7 @@ is it true about gcc?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5YokNW7tIs #+end_src - - Multi-quote to messages on other Thread (I ADDED THE NEW LINES AFTER br) + - [ ] Multi-quote to messages on other Thread (I ADDED THE NEW LINES AFTER br) #+begin_src html >>92762320
I have a macro that typedef's up to 2 levels of pointers. If I ever need more, then I can modify the macro and everything will now have the extra typedefs applied. (pic related)
@@ -40,15 +93,15 @@ >rumours about the NT kernal
read the source. download the WRK from github. that code used to run on every PC in existence. #+end_src - - Multi-quote messages are separate by 2

- - Link to Message on another Thread + - [ ] Multi-quote messages are separate by 2

+ - [ ] Link to Message on another Thread >>92748198 → >>92748198
- - Normal text is urlencoded + - [ ] Normal text is urlencoded Made me smile, Thank G'yoo Made me smile, Thank G'yoo - - Normal text might have a random ** - - Normal text has *
* for new lines + - [ ] Normal text might have a random ** + - [ ] Normal text has *
* for new lines Hi guys got a question I'm using Automatic 1111 how do I increase the generation batch count?