-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 300
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Farzin/PRODQA-921/Cashier dark mode issue #8700
Merged
amina-deriv
merged 8 commits into
binary-com:master
from
farzin-deriv:farzin/PRODQA-921/cashier_dark_mode_issue
May 30, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
28a146b
fix(cashier): :bug: fix cashier dark mode issue
b6d1c9d
test(cashier): :white_check_mark: fix the failing test
1388c50
Merge branch 'master' into farzin/PRODQA-921/cashier_dark_mode_issue
0c16052
Merge branch 'master' into farzin/PRODQA-921/cashier_dark_mode_issue
718b452
Merge branch 'master' into farzin/PRODQA-921/cashier_dark_mode_issue
16e4e43
Merge branch 'master' into farzin/PRODQA-921/cashier_dark_mode_issue
94f7dcf
Merge branch 'master' into farzin/PRODQA-921/cashier_dark_mode_issue
7ad9763
Merge branch 'master' into farzin/PRODQA-921/cashier_dark_mode_issue
amina-deriv File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it's not that important but just for having more consistency for our code style I'm asking this. I saw in this PR we are getting our data from store like this:
but here you actually changed the syntax. IMO the way you wrote it is more clear to understand , So I think we can discuss and agree on one of the formats for the future
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@shayan-deriv Yeah agree with you, I personally try to avoid nested object destructuring cause it will be hard to follow by eye. It similar to nested ternary operator situation 👀