Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Recent troubles with backintime #1243

Closed
chris3392 opened this issue Apr 2, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

Recent troubles with backintime #1243

chris3392 opened this issue Apr 2, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@chris3392
Copy link

Hi all,

I have been using backintime for ever
Since a short while, some of my backups complete with errors and the log contains message similar to this ones, stating there is an error because the file exists:

[E] Error: rsync: link "/media/Xtras/BKUP_ssh_x390/backintime/x390/chris/3/new_snapshot/backup/home/chris/Documents/tools/SFDX/sfdx-cli-v6.55.1-be0b3dc4c4-linux-x64/node_modules/rx/ts/rx.es6.d.ts" => ../../20220402-100001-570/backup/home/chris/Documents/tools/SFDX/sfdx-cli-v6.55.1-be0b3dc4c4-linux-x64/node_modules/rx/ts/rx.es6.d.ts failed: File exists (17)
[E] Error: rsync: link "/media/Xtras/BKUP_ssh_x390/backintime/x390/chris/3/new_snapshot/backup/home/chris/Documents/tools/SFDX/sfdx-cli-v6.55.1-be0b3dc4c4-linux-x64/node_modules/salesforce-alm/node_modules/lodash/_copySymbolsIn.js" => ../../20220402-100001-570/backup/home/chris/Documents/tools/SFDX/sfdx-cli-v6.55.1-be0b3dc4c4-linux-x64/node_modules/salesforce-alm/node_modules/lodash/_copySymbolsIn.js failed: File exists (17)
[E] Error: rsync: link "/media/Xtras/BKUP_ssh_x390/backintime/x390/chris/3/new_snapshot/backup/home/chris/Documents/tools/SFDX/sfdx-cli-v6.55.1-be0b3dc4c4-linux-x64/node_modules/selenium-standalone/node_modules/lodash/fp/allPass.js" => ../../20220402-100001-570/backup/home/chris/Documents/tools/SFDX/sfdx-cli-v6.55.1-be0b3dc4c4-linux-x64/node_modules/selenium-standalone/node_modules/lodash/fp/allPass.js failed: File exists (17)
[E] Error: rsync: link "/media/Xtras/BKUP_ssh_x390/backintime/x390/chris/3/new_snapshot/backup/home/chris/Documents/tools/SFDX/sfdx-cli-v6.55.1-be0b3dc4c4-linux-x64/node_modules/ts-lodash/node_modules/lodash/_baseIsArrayBuffer.js" => ../../20220402-100001-570/backup/home/chris/Documents/tools/SFDX/sfdx-cli-v6.55.1-be0b3dc4c4-linux-x64/node_modules/ts-lodash/node_modules/lodash/_baseIsArrayBuffer.js failed: File exists (17)
[E] Error: rsync: link "/media/Xtras/BKUP_ssh_x390/backintime/x390/chris/3/new_snapshot/backup/home/chris/Documents/tools/SFDX/sfdx-cli-v7.36.0-b1c4e9c7c8-linux-x64/node_modules/@salesforce/sfdx-trust/node_modules/cli-ux/node_modules/string-width/license" => ../../20220402-100001-570/backup/home/chris/Documents/tools/SFDX/sfdx-cli-v7.36.0-b1c4e9c7c8-linux-x64/node_modules/@salesforce/sfdx-trust/node_modules/cli-ux/node_modules/string-width/license failed: File exists (17)
[E] Error: rsync: link "/media/Xtras/BKUP_ssh_x390/backintime/x390/chris/3/new_snapshot/backup/home/chris/Documents/tools/SFDX/sfdx-cli-v7.36.0-b1c4e9c7c8-linux-x64/node_modules/lodash.isinteger/LICENSE" => ../../20220402-100001-570/backup/home/chris/Documents/tools/SFDX/sfdx-cli-v7.36.0-b1c4e9c7c8-linux-x64/node_modules/lodash.isinteger/LICENSE failed: File exists (17)
[E] Error: rsync: link "/media/Xtras/BKUP_ssh_x390/backintime/x390/chris/3/new_snapshot/backup/home/chris/Documents/tools/SFDX/sfdx-cli-v7.36.0-b1c4e9c7c8-linux-x64/node_modules/rx/src/core/linq/observable/delay.js" => ../../20220402-100001-570/backup/home/chris/Documents/tools/SFDX/sfdx-cli-v7.36.0-b1c4e9c7c8-linux-x64/node_modules/rx/src/core/linq/observable/delay.js failed: File exists (17)
[E] Error: rsync: link "/media/Xtras/BKUP_ssh_x390/backintime/x390/chris/3/new_snapshot/backup/home/chris/Documents/tools/SFDX/sfdx-cli-v7.36.0-b1c4e9c7c8-linux-x64/node_modules/rxjs/_esm5/internal/operators/shareReplay.js" => ../../20220402-100001-570/backup/home/chris/Documents/tools/SFDX/sfdx-cli-v7.36.0-b1c4e9c7c8-linux-x64/node_modules/rxjs/_esm5/internal/operators/shareReplay.js failed: File exists (17)
[E] Error: rsync: link "/media/Xtras/BKUP_ssh_x390/backintime/x390/chris/3/new_snapshot/backup/home/chris/Documents/tools/SFDX/sfdx-cli-v7.36.0-b1c4e9c7c8-linux-x64/node_modules/rxjs/src/internal/observable/timer.ts" => ../../20220402-100001-570/backup/home/chris/Documents/tools/SFDX/sfdx-cli-v7.36.0-b1c4e9c7c8-linux-x64/node_modules/rxjs/src/internal/observable/timer.ts failed: File exists (17)

If it helps, this is a remote (ssh) backup and the remote folder is a luks file mounted on /media/Xtras/BKUP_ssh_x390 and has In excess of 180 GB available space...

I have not been able to find a specific file name pattern for the failing files.

I have not checked all files effectively exist when such a message arrive; however checking one of them shows id does exist.

Any idea why are these errors being thrown at me ??

Also if i remove the failed backup and run manually then it may run without errors.....

Tx

@0xpr03
Copy link

0xpr03 commented Apr 25, 2022

What OS/Version/Distribution ? Which BiT version ?

@chris3392
Copy link
Author

Apologies for the delay in responding.
I found the reason for the error (which might trigger a different bug).
As it turned out, I have been updating an old profile set from a previous backup restored on this machine.
What I did is disable the main profile; then create a new profile for an ssh backup, (as well as a local backup); so 3 profile with main profile disabled and 2 other profiles enabled.
What happen is that, at some point, the profile #3 got copied as profile #1 (main profile) as well; hence I had 2 backintime backups running concurrently doing exactly the same backup on the same set of data with the same disk folder as target.
Hence, sometime, one of the backup (maybe both I do not know) would find the files already existing as they were copied from the the other backup
What I did is disable again the main backup, and everything is back to normal.

Of course, the mystery is why the non main backup has been copied as a duplicate in main backup....

This is strange, but in any case is a minor annoyance compared to the value of backintime.

@gsker
Copy link

gsker commented Jul 28, 2022

@emtiu this can be closed

@emtiu
Copy link
Member

emtiu commented Jul 28, 2022

@emtiu this can be closed

I agree, thanks!

@emtiu emtiu closed this as completed Jul 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants