Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Select directories/files to include/exclude in tree view with checkboxes #972

Open
DanitiKain opened this issue Jan 20, 2019 · 4 comments
Open
Labels
Feature requests a new feature Low relevant, but not urgent

Comments

@DanitiKain
Copy link

BackInTime is great but if you have specific directories and files you want to include and exclude then it can be very time consuming. The interface of Kbackup is something that the team should review as it makes selecting and not selecting files/folders a breeze. Be nice if you could mimic this interface a bit for selecting what to backup.

@buhtz
Copy link
Member

buhtz commented Sep 26, 2022

@DanitiKain There is a new forming maintaining team and we do review all issues. Is this problem still relevant for you, can you reproduce it with a newer or the latest release? Did you find a solution?

Can you please show us some screenshots please and point us to the most interesting or best parts of that GUI.

Tag: Feature, GUI, Feedback

@emtiu emtiu added Feature requests a new feature Feedback needs user response, may be closed after timeout without a response labels Oct 9, 2022
@emtiu
Copy link
Member

emtiu commented Oct 9, 2022

It's bascially a tree view where you can select (sub-)folders by using checkboxes:

It's a good concept, so let's keep this Feature request.

@emtiu emtiu removed the Feedback needs user response, may be closed after timeout without a response label Oct 9, 2022
@emtiu emtiu changed the title RFE: Interface Update like Kbackup Select directories/files to include/exclude in tree view with checkboxes Oct 9, 2022
@buhtz
Copy link
Member

buhtz commented Oct 9, 2022

Thanks for the hint. I like that.

But I wouldn't just "add" it to the current BIT. I would take this into account when re-designing the whole GUI. This is a big/meta project. And having such a selectable tree is so basic and usual that I wouldn't keep an extra Issue open for it.

I mean when we do the GUI redesign (far away in the future) we definitely will add something like that.

No matter that this Issue is important I vote for close because we won't forget it. ;)

@emtiu
Copy link
Member

emtiu commented Oct 9, 2022

Heh, I see! However, I'd like to keep this Issues as a reminder. With the Feature requests a new feature Low relevant, but not urgent Labels, it won't hurt. Maybe when things have calmed down, we can have another Label called Utopia for far-future features ;)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature requests a new feature Low relevant, but not urgent
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants