Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Please add Met Norway as weather provider #33

Closed
serrq opened this issue Sep 5, 2024 · 6 comments
Closed

Please add Met Norway as weather provider #33

serrq opened this issue Sep 5, 2024 · 6 comments

Comments

@serrq
Copy link

serrq commented Sep 5, 2024

https://api.met.no/

https://www.met.no/en

https://api.met.no/doc/support

@serrq serrq changed the title Pleass add Met Norway weather provider Please add Met Norway as weather provider Sep 7, 2024
@bmaroti9
Copy link
Owner

bmaroti9 commented Sep 12, 2024

Working on it!

Screencast.from.2024-09-12.18-00-58.mp4

there are problems though. like after 3 days it only returns 4 hours/day, like that there is no air quality, and there are some places where it doesn't return precipitation or wind. I also had to write my own algorithm for feels like, because it didn't have it.

But hopefully it will work. the big decision is what do do with the lack of air quality.
Currently in this demo, i'm just using the air quality from open-meteo.

@serrq
Copy link
Author

serrq commented Sep 12, 2024

Air quality ---> /

It means "not available with this provider".

@bmaroti9
Copy link
Owner

how about keeping it like this and just letting the air quality data be from open-meteo?

image

because if we do it in the way you said then it would make the radar appear which would look kind of ugly.

image

@serrq
Copy link
Author

serrq commented Sep 16, 2024

Or just "not available". Maybe is aesthetically more pleasant.

how about keeping it like this and just letting the air quality data be from open-meteo?

I had the same thoughts. Personally I say "no".
Could you write to Met Norway support team and informing them of this lack?

@bmaroti9
Copy link
Owner

I'm not going to write to them. This is not as simple as just writing some code. They would need to set up tons of measuring stations, to get the data, and they are not going to do that just because I asked them.
But you can ask them yourself...
Till then it's gonna stay like this.

@bmaroti9
Copy link
Owner

available with v2.4.2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants