Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

incorrect attention % values in ac table after visiting excluded site #3341

Closed
LaurenWags opened this issue Feb 13, 2019 · 6 comments
Closed

Comments

@LaurenWags
Copy link
Member

Description

If you exclude a site from your ac table and then visit it later, your attention percentage values in the table won't add up to 100%. It seems as though your table is counting the excluded site in your % values even though it's not listed in the table itself.

Steps to Reproduce

Found with an upgrade profile, but happens on a clean profile as well. Steps below are for clean profile.

  1. Clean profile. Enable Rewards.
  2. Visit some sites (4-5) for min time needed.
  3. Exclude a site or two. Note which site(s) you exclude.
  4. Visit a site not in the table for min time needed.
  5. View ac table. Note that all % values add up to 100.
  6. Revisit one of the excluded sites for min time needed.
  7. View ac table.

Actual result:

screen shot 2019-02-13 at 12 54 36 pm

Expected result:

All attention values should add up to 100%. Visiting the excluded site should not have any effect on the attention values since it is excluded.

Reproduces how often:

easily

Brave version (brave://version info)

Brave 0.60.28 Chromium: 72.0.3626.96 (Official Build) beta(64-bit)
Revision 84098ee7ef8622a9defc2ef043cd8930b617b10e-refs/branch-heads/3626@{#836}
OS Mac OS X

Reproducible on current release: does not reproduce on 0.59.35

  • Does it reproduce on brave-browser dev/beta builds? yes beta

Website problems only:

  • Does the issue resolve itself when disabling Brave Shields? n/a
  • Is the issue reproducible on the latest version of Chrome? n/a

Additional Information

cc @brave/legacy_qa @NejcZdovc

@mandar-brave mandar-brave added the priority/P2 A bad problem. We might uplift this to the next planned release. label Feb 13, 2019
@GeetaSarvadnya
Copy link

Reproduced on windows 10 x64 - 0.60.27

image

@LaurenWags
Copy link
Member Author

Verified this issue does not reproduce on latest Dev

Brave 0.61.22 Chromium: 72.0.3626.81 (Official Build) dev(64-bit)
Revision ac8b982e05014492d1bd7d317628a4f22a97ffa0-refs/branch-heads/3626@{#796}

@NejcZdovc
Copy link
Contributor

@kjozwiak should we create custom fix for 0.60 or are we ok with just closing it as it will be fixed in 0.61?

@rebron
Copy link
Collaborator

rebron commented Feb 16, 2019

Closing this issue. Fixed in 61.x with: brave/brave-core#1600

@rebron rebron closed this as completed Feb 16, 2019
@NejcZdovc NejcZdovc self-assigned this Feb 16, 2019
@btlechowski btlechowski added this to the 0.61.x - Beta milestone Feb 19, 2019
@LaurenWags
Copy link
Member Author

LaurenWags commented Feb 19, 2019

@brave/legacy_qa when verifying this issue we will need to see what happens if you encounter this issue on 0.60.x and then update to a build (in 0.61.x) with the fix.

@NejcZdovc if someone is already in this state, will the fix for this issue update anyone in this state?

@btlechowski
Copy link

btlechowski commented Feb 27, 2019

Verification passed on

Brave 0.61.38 Chromium: 73.0.3683.39 (Official Build) beta (64-bit)
Revision cc53b0e12fcaf42e4bab8d6c23bd4fb7aae99f6c-refs/branch-heads/3683@{#413}
OS Windows 7 Service Pack 1 Build 7601.24312

Verification passed on

Brave 0.61.40 Chromium: 73.0.3683.39 (Official Build) beta (64-bit)
Revision cc53b0e12fcaf42e4bab8d6c23bd4fb7aae99f6c-refs/branch-heads/3683@{#413}
OS Linux Mint

Verification PASSED on macOS 10.14.3 x64 using the following build:

Brave 0.61.50 Chromium: 73.0.3683.67 (Official Build) (64-bit)
Revision a83fd4f3207ae83412d329a9ca1239dd1e068345-refs/branch-heads/3683@{#760}
OS Mac OS X

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants