Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Modify ProcessVariableAsList to accept sets too #52

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 4, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

Modify ProcessVariableAsList to accept sets too #52

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 4, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

Right now we have to force things into list format for it.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by melonhea...@gmail.com on 24 Apr 2012 at 11:14

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Original comment by melonhea...@gmail.com on 3 May 2012 at 10:07

  • Added labels: Type-Enhancement
  • Removed labels: Type-Defect

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Convert the function to take any enumerable type.

Original comment by Todd.Sch...@gmail.com on 28 Feb 2013 at 11:23

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

This would really only be necessary as part of a larger refactoring of 
TypeManager's collections handling.

Original comment by melonhea...@gmail.com on 14 Jun 2013 at 11:41

  • Added labels: Type-InternalCleanup, Priority-Low
  • Removed labels: Type-Enhancement, Priority-Medium

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant