Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement transaction lock zmq notifications #903

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 15, 2016
Merged

Implement transaction lock zmq notifications #903

merged 6 commits into from
Jul 15, 2016

Conversation

UdjinM6
Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 commented Jul 6, 2016

zmq notification for IS lock as requested by evo devs
@snogcel

@UdjinM6
Copy link
Author

UdjinM6 commented Jul 10, 2016

updated to always push zmqpubhashtxlock even if tx is not from/to our wallet

@@ -481,6 +481,7 @@ std::string HelpMessage(HelpMessageMode mode)
strUsage += HelpMessageGroup(_("ZeroMQ notification options:"));
strUsage += HelpMessageOpt("-zmqpubhashblock=<address>", _("Enable publish hash block in <address>"));
strUsage += HelpMessageOpt("-zmqpubhashtx=<address>", _("Enable publish hash transaction in <address>"));
strUsage += HelpMessageOpt("-zmqpubhashtxlock=<address>", _("Enable publish hash transaction (locked via InastantSend) in <address>"));

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

InstantSend :)

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ooops :)

@UdjinM6
Copy link
Author

UdjinM6 commented Jul 11, 2016

fixed a bug, thanks @snogcel !

@UdjinM6
Copy link
Author

UdjinM6 commented Jul 11, 2016

added rawtxlock

@schinzelh
Copy link

utACK

@schinzelh schinzelh merged commit 90adb89 into dashpay:v0.12.1.x Jul 15, 2016
@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 deleted the zmqNotifyTransactionLock branch August 28, 2016 12:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants