Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SPIKE] Investigate state of transactions #773

Open
2 of 5 tasks
dataders opened this issue Apr 18, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
2 of 5 tasks

[SPIKE] Investigate state of transactions #773

dataders opened this issue Apr 18, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request transactions

Comments

@dataders
Copy link
Contributor

Is this your first time submitting a feature request?

  • I have read the expectations for open source contributors
  • I have searched the existing issues, and I could not find an existing issue for this feature
  • I am requesting a straightforward extension of existing dbt-redshift functionality, rather than a Big Idea better suited to a discussion

Describe the feature

Several issues already exist that even today, transactions are not working in dbt-redshift as they should

Similar to dbt-labs/dbt-core#9980 but only for dbt-redshift. Less future looking, but rather backward looking. How can we get back to a previous state?

questions

Transaction-related open issues

  1. bug regression transactions
  2. bug help_wanted regression transactions
  3. High Severity backport 1.7.latest bug regression support
    VersusFacit mikealfare
  4. performance regression transactions
    dataders
  5. bug regression transactions
    colin-rogers-dbt dataders

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Who will this benefit?

No response

Are you interested in contributing this feature?

No response

Anything else?

No response

@dataders dataders added enhancement New feature or request triage transactions and removed triage labels Apr 18, 2024
@victor-frank-signet
Copy link

victor-frank-signet commented Jul 26, 2024

I want to add that is this a problem with redshift_connector AND the redshift version? Some people say it started in 1.5+. But once the bug was reported others have said if they downgraded from 1.5+ to 1.4 and 1.4 the error persists.

#766 (comment)
#501 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request transactions
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants