Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Feature Request]Anti-Relay #83

Open
Handsome1080P opened this issue Oct 23, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

[Feature Request]Anti-Relay #83

Handsome1080P opened this issue Oct 23, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Handsome1080P
Copy link

Just a simple request.
@dndx dndx added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 7, 2022
@dndx
Copy link
Owner

dndx commented Nov 7, 2022

This is something I want to avoid, as it could affect the packet header length of Phantun TCP packet. It is always more desirable to simply use an underlying protocol that is replay resistant. Phantun is not designed to address security issues.

@Handsome1080P
Copy link
Author

This is something I want to avoid, as it could affect the packet header length of Phantun TCP packet. It is always more desirable to simply use an underlying protocol that is replay resistant. Phantun is not designed to address security issues.

Yeah,just a simple anti-relay is enough ,not need encrypt or obfuscate

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@dndx @Handsome1080P