Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Transient disposable section updates #31689

Closed
guardrex opened this issue Feb 5, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #31705
Closed

Transient disposable section updates #31689

guardrex opened this issue Feb 5, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #31705
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@guardrex
Copy link
Collaborator

guardrex commented Feb 5, 2024

Description

Per the offline discussion ...

  • Revise the utility base class (OwningComponentBase) section. We might say it's more important on the server than on the client ... that the client-side use is still a problem. They should be avoided client-side, too.
  • Move the code completely into the sample apps, making it a fully working demo. 🔪 the code from the article. Give readers links to the code in the sample apps.

Page URL

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/blazor/fundamentals/dependency-injection?view=aspnetcore-8.0

Content source URL

https://github.com/dotnet/AspNetCore.Docs/blob/main/aspnetcore/blazor/fundamentals/dependency-injection.md

Document ID

d9aabe95-69e9-0a03-81ff-429914137f9d

Article author

@guardrex

@guardrex guardrex added Source - Docs.ms Docs Customer feedback via GitHub Issue ⌚ Not Triaged labels Feb 5, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Blazor label Feb 5, 2024
@guardrex guardrex added Pri1 High priority, do before Pri2 and Pri3 doc-enhancement 8.0 .NET 8 and removed Source - Docs.ms Docs Customer feedback via GitHub Issue labels Feb 5, 2024
@dotnet dotnet deleted a comment from github-actions bot Feb 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants