Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Publish a new version of CoreDisTools NuGet packages #349

Closed
echesakov opened this issue Mar 1, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Publish a new version of CoreDisTools NuGet packages #349

echesakov opened this issue Mar 1, 2022 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@echesakov
Copy link
Contributor

I realized that I haven't published a new version of CoreDisTools NuGet packages after updating the LLVM to 13.0 6fedaca

In addition to that, we would need to update clrjit2 blob with the newer versions of the libraries (if we want to use the new version with superpmi.py). IIRC, only macos-arm64 libcoredistools.dylib was added to the blob storage. Is this correct, @kunalspathak?

@echesakov echesakov self-assigned this Mar 1, 2022
@kunalspathak
Copy link
Member

I see it is uploaded for osx-64 and osx-arm64

@echesakov echesakov removed their assignment Mar 16, 2022
@echesakov
Copy link
Contributor Author

Un-assigning myself
cc @BruceForstall

@BruceForstall
Copy link
Member

I published the new coredistools from build https://dev.azure.com/dnceng/public/_build/results?buildId=1665935&view=artifacts&pathAsName=false&type=publishedArtifacts to the clrjit blob container (within https://clrjit2.blob.core.windows.net/superpmi/libcoredistools/; coredistools is downloaded from there by superpmi.py if it doesn't find an existing coredistools in Core_Root).

Note that we don't build windows-arm coredistools any more, so I left the old one there.

@dotnet/jit-contrib Let me know if you notice any problems.

@BruceForstall BruceForstall self-assigned this Mar 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants