Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

send_resource in participant not delete when participant delete #4122

Closed
1 task done
ulongcha opened this issue Dec 11, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #4300
Closed
1 task done

send_resource in participant not delete when participant delete #4122

ulongcha opened this issue Dec 11, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #4300
Labels
in progress Issue or PR which is being reviewed

Comments

@ulongcha
Copy link

ulongcha commented Dec 11, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Is there an already existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Expected behavior

When ClientParticipant delete rightly, the ClientParticipant's related send_source is deleted rightly so that there will be no warning info.

Current behavior

Using TCPTransport, when ClientParticipant delete rightly, the ClientParticipant's related send_source is still in ServerParticipant's send_source_list_, which caused warning info.
Not connect
send_resource_list_size

Steps to reproduce

create a ClientParticipant, connect to ServerParticipant, delete ClientParticipant
create a ClientParticipant, connect to ServerParticipant again.

Fast DDS version/commit

2.11.2

Platform/Architecture

Ubuntu Focal 20.04 amd64

Transport layer

TCPv4

Additional context

No response

XML configuration file

No response

Relevant log output

No response

Network traffic capture

No response
@ulongcha ulongcha added the triage Issue pending classification label Dec 11, 2023
@ulongcha ulongcha reopened this Dec 20, 2023
@JesusPoderoso
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ulongcha, thanks for using Fast DDS.
We have in our roadmap to solve that issue, and we will let you know once it is included in a release

@JesusPoderoso JesusPoderoso added in progress Issue or PR which is being reviewed and removed triage Issue pending classification labels Jan 15, 2024
@ulongcha
Copy link
Author

Hi @ulongcha, thanks for using Fast DDS. We have in our roadmap to solve that issue, and we will let you know once it is included in a release

Thank you very much!

@jepemi jepemi mentioned this issue Jan 29, 2024
Merged
12 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
in progress Issue or PR which is being reviewed
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

[20120] TCPSendResources cleanup eProsima/Fast-DDS
2 participants
@ulongcha @JesusPoderoso