Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Additional context around the max_retention #19037

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 9, 2020
Merged

Conversation

AndyHunt66
Copy link
Contributor

I think it would be good to get some extra information around the max_retention setting, to make it clear that unless the tenant itself has a longer retention period, then 7 days is going to be all that you can fetch

Follow-on from investigation behind #18948

I think it would be good to get some extra information around the max_retention setting, to make it clear that unless the tenant itself has a longer retention period, then 7 days is going to be all that you can fetch
@botelastic botelastic bot added the needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label label Jun 8, 2020
@AndyHunt66 AndyHunt66 requested a review from adriansr June 8, 2020 15:29
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/siem (Team:SIEM)

@botelastic botelastic bot removed the needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label label Jun 8, 2020
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

elasticmachine commented Jun 8, 2020

💚 Build Succeeded

Pipeline View Test View Changes Artifacts preview

Expand to view the summary

Build stats

  • Build Cause: [Pull request #19037 updated]

  • Start Time: 2020-06-09T08:21:12.890+0000

  • Duration: 21 min 9 sec

@adriansr adriansr added the docs label Jun 9, 2020
@adriansr adriansr merged commit 05935ee into master Jun 9, 2020
adriansr pushed a commit to adriansr/beats that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2020
I think it would be good to get some extra information around the max_retention setting, to make it clear that unless the tenant itself has a longer retention period, then 7 days is going to be all that you can fetch.

Follow-on from investigation behind elastic#18948

(cherry picked from commit 05935ee)
@adriansr adriansr added the v7.9.0 label Jun 9, 2020
adriansr pushed a commit to adriansr/beats that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2020
I think it would be good to get some extra information around the max_retention setting, to make it clear that unless the tenant itself has a longer retention period, then 7 days is going to be all that you can fetch.

Follow-on from investigation behind elastic#18948

(cherry picked from commit 05935ee)
@adriansr adriansr added the v7.8.0 label Jun 9, 2020
adriansr added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2020
I think it would be good to get some extra information around the max_retention setting, to make it clear that unless the tenant itself has a longer retention period, then 7 days is going to be all that you can fetch.

Follow-on from investigation behind #18948

(cherry picked from commit 05935ee)

Co-authored-by: AndyHunt66 <andrew.hunt@elastic.co>
adriansr added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2020
I think it would be good to get some extra information around the max_retention setting, to make it clear that unless the tenant itself has a longer retention period, then 7 days is going to be all that you can fetch.

Follow-on from investigation behind #18948

(cherry picked from commit 05935ee)

Co-authored-by: AndyHunt66 <andrew.hunt@elastic.co>
melchiormoulin pushed a commit to melchiormoulin/beats that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2020
I think it would be good to get some extra information around the max_retention setting, to make it clear that unless the tenant itself has a longer retention period, then 7 days is going to be all that you can fetch.

Follow-on from investigation behind elastic#18948
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants