Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ESP Zigbee and Rainmaker (TZ-1082) #413

Open
djorr5 opened this issue Aug 27, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

ESP Zigbee and Rainmaker (TZ-1082) #413

djorr5 opened this issue Aug 27, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@djorr5
Copy link

djorr5 commented Aug 27, 2024

Question

general question. I am playing around with the Rainmaker side of things and want to setup a Zigbee Gateway so it can be controlled through Rainmaker. However I am forced to use IDF 5.3 due to this issue:
https://github.com/espressif/esp-matter/issues/1024 Ignore the Matter part, I was experiencing the same issue as OP described.

But I also remembered that you have stated that the Zigbee must be compiled with 5.1.4. Is there a way to compile the rainmaker code with 5.3 and the zigbee code with 5.1.4? Or will there be no issues with just using 5.3 for the whole project?

Additional context.

No response

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title ESP Zigbee and Rainmaker ESP Zigbee and Rainmaker (TZ-1082) Aug 27, 2024
@Nanowires
Copy link

Nanowires commented Aug 27, 2024

@djorr5: Did you manage to have wifi and zigbee running in parallel?
I was only able to connect to a WiFi network, when zigbee wasn't started yet, and as soon as I start the zigbee stuff, the network connection is unusable, (80% of ping drops). Is this only on my side?

Or do you want to use two devices connected via UART?

@djorr5
Copy link
Author

djorr5 commented Aug 28, 2024

@Nanowires I am using a 2 SOC solution. 1 x S3 and 1 x H2. I don't believe you can use just the one SOC to do both Zigbee and WiFi at the same time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants
@djorr5 @Nanowires and others