Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix and test LB Lees Edwards particle coupling #4948

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 8, 2024

Conversation

RudolfWeeber
Copy link
Contributor

@RudolfWeeber RudolfWeeber commented Jul 4, 2024

  • When finding ghosts of a position for applying forces to LB, take Lees-Edwards offset into account
  • Correct interpolated fluid velocities for Lees-Edwards velocity shift when using an interpolation position across an LE boundary
  • Simplify and correct the shifting and interpolation of LB PDF ghost layers, when a Lees-Edwards offset is applied
  • Move application of forces from MD to the correct place for LB with pull scheme
  • More extensive testing of LB Lees-Edwards particle coupling

RudolfWeeber and others added 2 commits July 8, 2024 18:06
Capture Lees-Edwards parameters by reference, remove mention of Python
in the core, improve code coverage.
Copy link
Member

@jngrad jngrad left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jngrad jngrad added Testcase Core automerge Merge with kodiak waLBerla Issues regarding waLBerla integration labels Jul 8, 2024
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit fe94b6a into espressomd:python Jul 8, 2024
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge with kodiak Core Testcase waLBerla Issues regarding waLBerla integration
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants