Call for Input: Accidental function in ERC-223

[SamWilsn]

Decision	Will we merge ethereum/EIPs#7856? See that pull request for details.
Method	Rough Consensus
Deadline	November 16, 2023

tl;dr function was removed from spec then later accidentally re-added.

[SamWilsn]

I don't see a problem with this. Like @Pandapip1 says, removing this function is backwards compatible and this definitely looks like a mistake on the authors' part.

---

merge

[Pandapip1]

+1 for me. Will also assist @Dexaran if he wants to seperate this into its own standard as-is.

[xinbenlv]

I thought the ERC-223 is... final?

[g11tech]

i am fine removing something which accidentally got by and already notifies in EIP that implementations shouldn't depend on it

[xinbenlv]

I am fine to have it removed if it's accidental inclusion provided it's still very recently finalized. And let's avoid this next time together.

[bumblefudge]

cut-and-dry example of an "errata" edit-- not a normative change, doesn't break anything normative, grounded in the history of the PR