This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 6, 2023. It is now read-only.
Fix nil verified deal weight #360
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Do we know why this caused a panic in gfc, but not Lotus? |
whyrusleeping
approved these changes
May 11, 2020
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This was found in production.
I haven't gone to effort to cement this with regression tests because this whole SectoStorageWeightDesc and back-and-forth with the power actor is technical debt holdover from when the power actor owned these calculations, and I intend to remove most of it.
Closes #359, filecoin-project/venus#4094