-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 298
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enhance more types for partnership #5003
Comments
I saw the forum post, but it did not give me enough information to implement this. We have the following types.
Marianne asked for a new type, which would also be 'Registered partnership' in English. |
a cohabitation agreement is not the same as a registered partnership or any form of marriage |
OK, just to be clear, I need someone (the webtrees community??) to suggest a list of keywords and corresponding English translations. |
okay, I'll see what I can come up with and will open a discussion for it on the forum. |
Forum topic for this issue |
@fisharebest TYPES
DEFINITIONSCivil marriage Religious marriage Common-law marriage A good example is this Danish rule (1241-1683): "If someone has a mistress in his house for three winters and apparently sleeps with her, and she commands him to keep her under lock and key, and apparently eats and drinks with him, then she shall be his wife and lawful mistress of the house." Registered civil partnership Civil union Cohabitation agreement
Lived together Please let me know if you need more intel on this. |
Hi Lars and Greg, I think Lars has done a very good job to find and explain these 7 relationships, they cover the most. |
do not enter a TYPE. |
@arbor95 Franz, the existing logic in 2.1 is allready "TYPE". |
and TYPE can not be left empty? |
@arbor95 I think the question here is if we're using the correct wording: "TYPE" or "type"? The latter is more of a value. The logic Greg is using is MARR:TYPE which for now has 3 values (or types). It's used for the kind of couple relationship as far as I got the programming logic correct. |
Just want to add that these are the statements used by aldfaer: 1: civil : nl:huwelijk | en:marriage So translating Partners to 'Registered civil partnership' would create wrong assumptions. Translating 'registered' to 'registered civil partnership' would solve. But I can understand that starting to label it 1 MARR to begin with implies that there is an official binding. Using ANUL if it's known that there was no legal binding, could maybe clear things. |
@jkr-wrk "Partners" is only the internal programming codeword. It's shown as "registered partnership" in the english GUI or the equivalent in other languages. |
Partners is the imported and exported string used in the GEDCOM. This will indicate to other software what relation this people have. Because I know one program that translates Partners as people living together it would be strange to pick this in this software as a legal bond. Also because naming it 'registered' or something else like 'legal bond' would better explain the relationship is not just two people feeling like they like each other as 'Partners' might do. |
In MyHeritage, when people live together it is: 1 EVEN So it correctly states it is not a marriage. But states there was an EVENt that made them RELational PARTNERS, i guess. |
@jkr-wrk this discussion is going in the wrong direction. Ths sole purpose of this issue is to enhance the various kinds of partnership (couple relationships) in webtrees. I'm not a programmer. So how this is done to achive this and how valid GEDCOM will be exported by webtrees, I leave that up to Greg. |
May be related to this topic?: 1 NAME Jane /Doe/ will in Dutch shown as "aangenomen huwelijksnaam"; in English "married name". |
Do you mean this list: List should be expended with a LEGAL name change event. At least in the Netherlands that is an official way to change a first or last name without marriage. For now it would be "OTHER" |
See https://www.webtrees.net/index.php/forum/8-translation/39079-partnership#10619
Or https://www.government.nl/topics/marriage-cohabitation-agreement-civil-partnership/marriage-civil-partnership-and-cohabitation-agreements
Or https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common-law_marriage
Or https://www.notaire-mariage-civil.ca/en/differences-between-marriage-common-law-or-civil-union/
More types in https://github.com/fisharebest/webtrees/blob/main/app/Elements/MarriageType.php are needed.
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: