Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Having multiscope in the filterTerm definition #95

Closed
costero-e opened this issue Jun 21, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Having multiscope in the filterTerm definition #95

costero-e opened this issue Jun 21, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@costero-e
Copy link
Collaborator

Solution proposed by @redmitry to attach information about the scope it applies for filtering terms.

{
    "id": "LOINC:3141-9",
    "label": "Weight",
    "type": "alphanumeric",
    "scope": ["individual", "biosamples", ...]
}

In this case, as filtering terms can be used for different scopes, adding multiscope information would solve the problem (if there is one) about where can a filtering term apply.
In my opinion, this is good for some models but for other models this can be a headache, so I would say this a good solution (and I would adopt it) to make life easier in some models but should be "optional" and not "required".

@costero-e
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Closing issue. See #94

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant