Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RSPAMD_URIBL is not checked on incoming mail? #24

Open
skerit opened this issue Jul 6, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

RSPAMD_URIBL is not checked on incoming mail? #24

skerit opened this issue Jul 6, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@skerit
Copy link

skerit commented Jul 6, 2020

system info

Haraka Haraka.js — Version: 2.8.25
Node v12.16.3
OS Linux calamity 4.15.0-99-generic #100-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 22 20:32:56 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
openssl OpenSSL 1.1.1 11 Sep 2018

Expected behavior

Scanning a spam message through rspamd's "scan" tab on its web interface reports a RSPAMD_URIBL symbol (with weight of 4.5).
I would expect incoming mail to also be tested on this, so it could be rejected. Here's the full list from the scan result:

ABUSE_SURBL (5.5)
RSPAMD_URIBL (4.5) 
HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_1 (2)
RBL_MAILSPIKE_WORST (2)
FROM_EXCESS_BASE64 (1.5)
SUBJECT_HAS_CURRENCY (1)
MIME_HTML_ONLY (0.2)
BAD_REP_POLICIES (0.1)
RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST (0.1)

Observed behavior

This RSPAMD_URIBL test is not applied to actual, incoming mail (it is not added to the X-Rspamd-Report header, its value is not added to the score.) This allows the spam to be accepted.

Here's the header of the actual received mail:

X-Rspamd-Bar: ++++++++++++
X-Rspamd-Report: ABUSE_SURBL(5.5) FROM_EXCESS_BASE64(1.5) HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_1(2) RBL_MAILSPIKE_WORST(2) BAD_REP_POLICIES(0.1) SUBJECT_HAS_CURRENCY(1) MIME_HTML_ONLY(0.2) FORGED_SENDER(0.3) RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.1)
X-Rspamd-Score: 12.699999

Steps to reproduce

Test incoming spam messages?
Do I have to enable this test somewhere?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant