Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow custom files and directories to be added the the getter landlock #20315

Closed
astudentofblake opened this issue Apr 8, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #20349
Closed

Allow custom files and directories to be added the the getter landlock #20315

astudentofblake opened this issue Apr 8, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #20349
Labels
stage/accepted Confirmed, and intend to work on. No timeline committment though. theme/artifact type/enhancement

Comments

@astudentofblake
Copy link
Contributor

Proposal

I would like to be able to configure the landlock in the getter to include custom files + directories
I propose adding config to ArtifactConfig. I'll raise a PR later

Use-cases

Currently I set SSL_CERT_DIR=<CUSTOM_DIRECTORY>:/etc/ssl/certs:/etc/pki/tls/certs to allow the getter to use ca certificates I have in a custom directory.
The default git on RHEL also needs access to "/dev/urandom"
A link to the git code: -
https://github.com/git/git/blob/19981daefd7c147444462739375462b49412ce33/wrapper.c#L797

In order to turn on landlock, I need to add read access to these paths

Attempted Solutions

I have turned off landlock, so that I can access these paths, but I would like the extra security.
I can't add the certificates to the OS.

@tgross
Copy link
Member

tgross commented Apr 8, 2024

Hi @astudentofblake! I did a little digging to verify the existing behavior and see if there are known workarounds, and it looks like no. The order of operations for Templates, Artifacts, and Dispatch Payloads means that none of the usual tools that someone might use to workaround this problem (ex. templating the certs into the allocdir) exist at the time the artifact is downloaded.

We do have a client.artifact configuration block that seems like the right place for this feature. Under the personas in our security model would allow the cluster administrator to add paths to the Landlock sandbox without letting a job author break its protection. It ends up being similar to the client.chroot_env block in that way.

I'm going to label this issue as accepted and mark it for roadmapping. If you are interested in submitting a PR for it, we'd be happy to review that. Thanks!

@tgross tgross added the stage/accepted Confirmed, and intend to work on. No timeline committment though. label Apr 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
stage/accepted Confirmed, and intend to work on. No timeline committment though. theme/artifact type/enhancement
Projects
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants