Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

indentation of texttable changes (txt vs nroff output) #203

Closed
ietf-svn-bot opened this issue Oct 25, 2013 · 9 comments
Closed

indentation of texttable changes (txt vs nroff output) #203

ietf-svn-bot opened this issue Oct 25, 2013 · 9 comments
Labels

Comments

@ietf-svn-bot
Copy link

owner:ietf@augustcellars.com resolution_fixed type_defect | by arusso@amsl.com


The v2 text output does not match v2 nroff output (then made into text). The table is shifted slightly to the right and the title is no longer centered. This is shown in the attached files, e.g., look at Table 2 in the rfcdiff file. Ideally, the v2 nroff output should create text that matches the v2 text output.

Perhaps this is related to #194 (regarding indentation of figures).

v2 text output:

                       +---------+-----------------+
                       | Value   | Semantics       |
                       +---------+-----------------+
                       | 0..19   | (Unassigned)    |
                       |         |                 |
                       | 20      | False           |
                       |         |                 |
                       | 21      | True            |
                       |         |                 |
                       | 22      | Null            |
                       |         |                 |
                       | 23      | Undefined value |
                       |         |                 |
                       | 24..31  | (Reserved)      |
                       |         |                 |
                       | 32..255 | (Unassigned)    |
                       +---------+-----------------+

                          Table 2: Simple Values

text made from v2 nroff output:

                        +---------+-----------------+
                        | Value   | Semantics       |
                        +---------+-----------------+
                        | 0..19   | (Unassigned)    |
                        |         |                 |
                        | 20      | False           |
                        |         |                 |
                        | 21      | True            |
                        |         |                 |
                        | 22      | Null            |
			|         |                 |
	                | 23      | Undefined value |
			|         |                 |
                        | 24..31  | (Reserved)      |
                        |         |                 |
                        | 32..255 | (Unassigned)    |
                        +---------+-----------------+

                          Table 2: Simple Values

Issue migrated from trac:203 at 2022-02-05 12:35:07 +0000

@ietf-svn-bot
Copy link
Author

@arusso@amsl.com uploaded file test7049.xml (120.5 KiB)

@ietf-svn-bot
Copy link
Author

@arusso@amsl.com uploaded file test7049.txt (130.9 KiB)

@ietf-svn-bot
Copy link
Author

@arusso@amsl.com uploaded file test7049-v2nroff.txt (132.0 KiB)

@ietf-svn-bot
Copy link
Author

@arusso@amsl.com uploaded file test7049-rfcdiff.html (212.0 KiB)

@ietf-svn-bot
Copy link
Author

@ietf@augustcellars.com changed owner from henrik@levkowetz.com to ietf@augustcellars.com

@ietf-svn-bot
Copy link
Author

@ietf@augustcellars.com commented


Problem has to do with the use of the .in 3 nroff directive and the fact that the centering algorithm does not realize that it exists when computing how much left padding to use.

Fixed in local version.

@ietf-svn-bot
Copy link
Author

@ietf@augustcellars.com changed status from new to closed

@ietf-svn-bot
Copy link
Author

@ietf@augustcellars.com changed resolution from `` to fixed

@ietf-svn-bot
Copy link
Author

@ietf@augustcellars.com commented


Fixed revision 968

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant