Proposal: rename jaeger-standalone to jaeger-all-in-one

[yurishkuro]

The docker image is labeled all-in-one but we call the executable jaeger-standalone and that's how it is included in the binary distributions. I propose we change the executable to be called all-in-one as well.

We can probably even rename the source directory to cmd/all-in-one, since the package name there is main anyway.

[black-adder]

let's keep releasing jaeger-standalone until we release 2.0? I'm pretty sure there are people who are directly using all-in-one.

[yurishkuro]

everyone should be using versioned releases, so if we rename it in 1.7 it's not going to break anyone unless people explicitly upgrade.

[yurishkuro]

everyone should be using versioned releases

Specifically, we're talking about renaming the binary, which you can ONLY download from a concrete version (unlike Docker images where we, mistakenly, published tag "1")

[jpkrohling]

Funny, I thought about opening an issue some time ago about this, but in the other direction: instead of "all-in-one", standardizing on "standalone".

[yurishkuro]

I think picking one name is more important than which name, but I think all-in-one is a bit more accurate and, more importantly, backwards compatible - there are many blog posts that refer to it already.

[jpkrohling]

For the record, I have nothing against all-in-one. I just find it easier to type "standalone" instead :-)

[Dieterbe]

👍