Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conflict with model spans and log-transformation in RegArima models #30

Open
palatej opened this issue May 26, 2015 · 1 comment
Open
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@palatej
Copy link
Contributor

palatej commented May 26, 2015

Source: Alina Sadovska

When the model span is used, a log-transformation can be chosen, even if some figures outside the model span are negative or 0. In that case, incoherent results will appear (the pre-adjustment factors correspond to the log-transformed series, but the linearized series is not log-transformed, due to the negative values).

Possible solutions:

  • put missing values at the positions corresponding to negative values (but quid if seasonal adjustment)
  • consider the log-transformation test on the complete series (not on the model span), at least for the presence of unacceptable figures.
  • ...
@palatej
Copy link
Contributor Author

palatej commented May 26, 2015

The second solution is probably the best one.

@palatej palatej added the bug label May 26, 2015
@palatej palatej self-assigned this May 26, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant