From 9828e960ab4cccc9526fd6cc61df430588bd0487 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicholas Nethercote Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 16:12:39 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] Remove `__rust_force_expr`. This was added (with a different name) to improve an error message. It is no longer needed -- removing it changes the error message, but overall I think the new message is no worse: - the mention of `#` in the first line is a little worse, - but the extra context makes it very clear what the problem is, perhaps even clearer than the old message, - and the removal of the note about the `expr` fragment (an internal detail of `__rust_force_expr`) is an improvement. Overall I think the error is quite clear and still far better than the old message that prompted #61933, which didn't even mention patterns. The motivation for this is #124141, which will cause pasted metavariables to be tokenized and reparsed instead of the AST node being cached. This change in behaviour occasionally has a non-zero perf cost, and `__rust_force_expr` causes the tokenize/reparse step to occur twice. Removing `__rust_force_expr` greatly reduces the extra overhead for the `deep-vector` benchmark. --- library/alloc/src/macros.rs | 18 ++++-------------- tests/ui/macros/vec-macro-in-pattern.rs | 2 +- tests/ui/macros/vec-macro-in-pattern.stderr | 7 +++++-- 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/library/alloc/src/macros.rs b/library/alloc/src/macros.rs index 0f767df6063a3..d5ca5c4ed27a2 100644 --- a/library/alloc/src/macros.rs +++ b/library/alloc/src/macros.rs @@ -41,18 +41,18 @@ #[allow_internal_unstable(rustc_attrs, liballoc_internals)] macro_rules! vec { () => ( - $crate::__rust_force_expr!($crate::vec::Vec::new()) + $crate::vec::Vec::new() ); ($elem:expr; $n:expr) => ( - $crate::__rust_force_expr!($crate::vec::from_elem($elem, $n)) + $crate::vec::from_elem($elem, $n) ); ($($x:expr),+ $(,)?) => ( - $crate::__rust_force_expr!(<[_]>::into_vec( + <[_]>::into_vec( // This rustc_box is not required, but it produces a dramatic improvement in compile // time when constructing arrays with many elements. #[rustc_box] $crate::boxed::Box::new([$($x),+]) - )) + ) ); } @@ -126,13 +126,3 @@ macro_rules! format { res }} } - -/// Force AST node to an expression to improve diagnostics in pattern position. -#[doc(hidden)] -#[macro_export] -#[unstable(feature = "liballoc_internals", issue = "none", reason = "implementation detail")] -macro_rules! __rust_force_expr { - ($e:expr) => { - $e - }; -} diff --git a/tests/ui/macros/vec-macro-in-pattern.rs b/tests/ui/macros/vec-macro-in-pattern.rs index ce4298b8bb334..26d7d4280fadb 100644 --- a/tests/ui/macros/vec-macro-in-pattern.rs +++ b/tests/ui/macros/vec-macro-in-pattern.rs @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ fn main() { match Some(vec![42]) { - Some(vec![43]) => {} //~ ERROR arbitrary expressions aren't allowed in patterns + Some(vec![43]) => {} //~ ERROR expected pattern, found `#` _ => {} } } diff --git a/tests/ui/macros/vec-macro-in-pattern.stderr b/tests/ui/macros/vec-macro-in-pattern.stderr index 1a446b8c3edbc..f32a2cf8e4350 100644 --- a/tests/ui/macros/vec-macro-in-pattern.stderr +++ b/tests/ui/macros/vec-macro-in-pattern.stderr @@ -1,10 +1,13 @@ -error: arbitrary expressions aren't allowed in patterns +error: expected pattern, found `#` --> $DIR/vec-macro-in-pattern.rs:7:14 | LL | Some(vec![43]) => {} | ^^^^^^^^ + | | + | expected pattern + | in this macro invocation + | this macro call doesn't expand to a pattern | - = note: the `expr` fragment specifier forces the metavariable's content to be an expression = note: this error originates in the macro `vec` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) error: aborting due to 1 previous error