New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Ours-WRN (in paper) is written as 59.06 (0.41) #1

Open

andreirusu opened this issue May 29, 2018 · 1 comment

andreirusu commented May 29, 2018

Yet the paper says 59.60 (0.41). Which one is correct?

skyuuka commented Feb 8, 2019 •

edited

Loading

I have a related question. I have run the codes, and get the following results:

0.54075058430718 0.087718464622564
0.69464093959732 0.064621921214153

There is some difference of the mean, but I am more curious about the std, which is as high as 8% , while in the paper it is just around 1% .

Any idea why?

Edit: I know the reason. It is using confidence interval of 95%, which is $1.96 * \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}$ , as shown in link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment