Remove dependance of record on institution

[blcham]

• ?record rm:was-treated-at ?institution should not be asserted, e.g.
  
• ?record rm:has-author ?user and ?user is-member-of ?institution can be used instead to find out relation between record and institution

---

Motivation:
We want to remove ?record rm:was-treated-at ?institution as it can be inferred from ?record rm:has-author ?userand?user is-member-of ?institution`

PREFIX rm: <http://onto.fel.cvut.cz/ontologies/record-manager/>

RULE: inferTreatmentInstitution
IF {
    ?record rm:has-author ?user .
    ?user rm:is-member-of ?institution .
}
THEN {
    ?record rm:was-treated-at ?institution .
}

---

User not being assigned to an institution was temporary solved in #186.

[blcham]

Open questions:

• does the following scenario work:
  • create a user
  • create some records
  • assign the user to an organization
  • check that records now belong to the organtization
  • assign the user to other organization
  • check that records now belong to the newly assigned organtization

[blcham]

Based on open question we decide ho to solve it.

[palagdan]

@blcham

Could you please tell me where I can find these rules? I can only see the relationships in a graph if they actually exist.