Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add support wireguard #30

Open
gabo1 opened this issue Oct 19, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

add support wireguard #30

gabo1 opened this issue Oct 19, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@gabo1
Copy link

gabo1 commented Oct 19, 2020

pls add support wireguard ubuntu

best

numbqq pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 7, 2020
[ Upstream commit 83f3522 ]

fib_trie_unmerge() is called with RTNL held, but not from an RCU
read-side critical section. This leads to the following warning [1] when
the FIB alias list in a leaf is traversed with
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu().

Since the function is always called with RTNL held and since
modification of the list is protected by RTNL, simply use
hlist_for_each_entry() and silence the warning.

[1]
WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
5.8.0-rc4-custom-01520-gc1f937f3f83b #30 Not tainted
-----------------------------
net/ipv4/fib_trie.c:1867 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!

other info that might help us debug this:

rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
1 lock held by ip/164:
 #0: ffffffff85a27850 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x49a/0xbd0

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 164 Comm: ip Not tainted 5.8.0-rc4-custom-01520-gc1f937f3f83b #30
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0x100/0x184
 lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x153/0x15d
 fib_trie_unmerge+0x608/0xdb0
 fib_unmerge+0x44/0x360
 fib4_rule_configure+0xc8/0xad0
 fib_nl_newrule+0x37a/0x1dd0
 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x4f7/0xbd0
 netlink_rcv_skb+0x17a/0x480
 rtnetlink_rcv+0x22/0x30
 netlink_unicast+0x5ae/0x890
 netlink_sendmsg+0x98a/0xf40
 ____sys_sendmsg+0x879/0xa00
 ___sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x190
 __sys_sendmsg+0x103/0x1d0
 __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x7d/0xb0
 do_syscall_64+0x54/0xa0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
RIP: 0033:0x7fc80a234e97
Code: Bad RIP value.
RSP: 002b:00007ffef8b66798 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007fc80a234e97
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007ffef8b66800 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 000000005f141b1c R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 00007fc80a2a8ac0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007ffef8b67008 R15: 0000556fccb10020

Fixes: 0ddcf43 ("ipv4: FIB Local/MAIN table collapse")
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
numbqq pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 7, 2020
[ Upstream commit 96298f6 ]

According to Core Spec Version 5.2 | Vol 3, Part A 6.1.5,
the incoming L2CAP_ConfigReq should be handled during
OPEN state.

The section below shows the btmon trace when running
L2CAP/COS/CFD/BV-12-C before and after this change.

=== Before ===
...
> ACL Data RX: Handle 256 flags 0x02 dlen 12                #22
      L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 2 len 4
        PSM: 1 (0x0001)
        Source CID: 65
< ACL Data TX: Handle 256 flags 0x00 dlen 16                #23
      L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 2 len 8
        Destination CID: 64
        Source CID: 65
        Result: Connection successful (0x0000)
        Status: No further information available (0x0000)
< ACL Data TX: Handle 256 flags 0x00 dlen 12                #24
      L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 2 len 4
        Destination CID: 65
        Flags: 0x0000
> HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5      #25
        Num handles: 1
        Handle: 256
        Count: 1
> HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5      #26
        Num handles: 1
        Handle: 256
        Count: 1
> ACL Data RX: Handle 256 flags 0x02 dlen 16                #27
      L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 3 len 8
        Destination CID: 64
        Flags: 0x0000
        Option: Unknown (0x10) [hint]
        01 00                                            ..
< ACL Data TX: Handle 256 flags 0x00 dlen 18                #28
      L2CAP: Configure Response (0x05) ident 3 len 10
        Source CID: 65
        Flags: 0x0000
        Result: Success (0x0000)
        Option: Maximum Transmission Unit (0x01) [mandatory]
          MTU: 672
> HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5      #29
        Num handles: 1
        Handle: 256
        Count: 1
> ACL Data RX: Handle 256 flags 0x02 dlen 14                #30
      L2CAP: Configure Response (0x05) ident 2 len 6
        Source CID: 64
        Flags: 0x0000
        Result: Success (0x0000)
> ACL Data RX: Handle 256 flags 0x02 dlen 20                #31
      L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 3 len 12
        Destination CID: 64
        Flags: 0x0000
        Option: Unknown (0x10) [hint]
        01 00 91 02 11 11                                ......
< ACL Data TX: Handle 256 flags 0x00 dlen 14                #32
      L2CAP: Command Reject (0x01) ident 3 len 6
        Reason: Invalid CID in request (0x0002)
        Destination CID: 64
        Source CID: 65
> HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5      #33
        Num handles: 1
        Handle: 256
        Count: 1
...
=== After ===
...
> ACL Data RX: Handle 256 flags 0x02 dlen 12               #22
      L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 2 len 4
        PSM: 1 (0x0001)
        Source CID: 65
< ACL Data TX: Handle 256 flags 0x00 dlen 16               #23
      L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 2 len 8
        Destination CID: 64
        Source CID: 65
        Result: Connection successful (0x0000)
        Status: No further information available (0x0000)
< ACL Data TX: Handle 256 flags 0x00 dlen 12               #24
      L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 2 len 4
        Destination CID: 65
        Flags: 0x0000
> HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5     #25
        Num handles: 1
        Handle: 256
        Count: 1
> HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5     #26
        Num handles: 1
        Handle: 256
        Count: 1
> ACL Data RX: Handle 256 flags 0x02 dlen 16               #27
      L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 3 len 8
        Destination CID: 64
        Flags: 0x0000
        Option: Unknown (0x10) [hint]
        01 00                                            ..
< ACL Data TX: Handle 256 flags 0x00 dlen 18               #28
      L2CAP: Configure Response (0x05) ident 3 len 10
        Source CID: 65
        Flags: 0x0000
        Result: Success (0x0000)
        Option: Maximum Transmission Unit (0x01) [mandatory]
          MTU: 672
> HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5     #29
        Num handles: 1
        Handle: 256
        Count: 1
> ACL Data RX: Handle 256 flags 0x02 dlen 14               #30
      L2CAP: Configure Response (0x05) ident 2 len 6
        Source CID: 64
        Flags: 0x0000
        Result: Success (0x0000)
> ACL Data RX: Handle 256 flags 0x02 dlen 20               #31
      L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 3 len 12
        Destination CID: 64
        Flags: 0x0000
        Option: Unknown (0x10) [hint]
        01 00 91 02 11 11                                .....
< ACL Data TX: Handle 256 flags 0x00 dlen 18               #32
      L2CAP: Configure Response (0x05) ident 3 len 10
        Source CID: 65
        Flags: 0x0000
        Result: Success (0x0000)
        Option: Maximum Transmission Unit (0x01) [mandatory]
          MTU: 672
< ACL Data TX: Handle 256 flags 0x00 dlen 12               #33
      L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 3 len 4
        Destination CID: 65
        Flags: 0x0000
> HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5     #34
        Num handles: 1
        Handle: 256
        Count: 1
> HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5     #35
        Num handles: 1
        Handle: 256
        Count: 1
...

Signed-off-by: Howard Chung <howardchung@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
@sellerie98
Copy link

Wireguard definitely supported in the more recent kernel versions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants