Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow users to choose installation directory (data path too?) #446

Open
tzarebczan opened this issue Aug 6, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Allow users to choose installation directory (data path too?) #446

tzarebczan opened this issue Aug 6, 2017 · 2 comments
Labels
needs: exploration Solution unclear, needs research priority: low Work should be done but can stay in the backlog for now type: improvement Existing (or partially existing) functionality needs to be changed

Comments

@tzarebczan
Copy link
Contributor

The Issue

Not sure if this applies to Linux or Mac, but the windows installer does not allow the user to select an installation directory. If users are concerned about this, then they will also be concerned with the data directories we have as well.
This could pose some downstream issues in terms of support or reinstall.

Steps to reproduce

1 . Install lbry
2. Installs to default program files directory as well as data directory.

Expected behaviour

Allow choice of install path, data path?

Actual behaviour

Tell us what happens instead

System Configuration

  • LBRY Daemon version:
  • LBRY App version:
  • LBRY Installation ID:
  • Operating system:

Anything Else

Screenshots

@tzarebczan tzarebczan added the type: improvement Existing (or partially existing) functionality needs to be changed label Aug 7, 2017
@liamcardenas liamcardenas added contributor friendly needs: exploration Solution unclear, needs research and removed contributor friendly needs: exploration Solution unclear, needs research labels Nov 17, 2017
@tzarebczan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Recently came up on Discord and I found this relevant discussion: aluxian/electron-windows-installer#11

@alyssaoc alyssaoc added the priority: low Work should be done but can stay in the backlog for now label Aug 21, 2018
@kauffj
Copy link
Member

kauffj commented Feb 5, 2020

How does our installer actually work? Is it possible this is as simple as an electron-builder flag?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs: exploration Solution unclear, needs research priority: low Work should be done but can stay in the backlog for now type: improvement Existing (or partially existing) functionality needs to be changed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants