Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rendering issue with map position/zoom + tileset w/Features per zoom level #6560

Closed
ksummerill opened this issue Apr 24, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Comments

@ksummerill
Copy link

mapbox-gl-js version: 0.44.2

Steps to Trigger Behavior

  1. Open this map: https://bl.ocks.org/j5kay/a50925604a76c892826e5d3a7db77ddd
  2. Click and drag to move around the map, observe rendering behavior.

Expected Behavior

Map rendering is smooth and consistent as you move around the map

Actual Behavior

Rendering is jumpy, appearing and disappearing - https://ookla.d.pr/GoSLAX

@jfirebaugh
Copy link
Contributor

Is mapbox://ookla-ops.coverage-carrier-3221 a partial tilset, not covering the whole world? If so, I suspect this is a variant of #5829 / #4691, where when GL JS encounters a 404 response for a tile outside but adjacent to the boundary of the tileset, which triggers loading the parent tile, which also covers tiles at the natural zoom level that do exist.

@j5kay
Copy link

j5kay commented Apr 25, 2018

@jfirebaugh - Yes, it has data not only within the LngLatBounds specified in the tileset's TileJSON, but also has features on a per-zoom basis between its z=0 to z=10 zoom extents (also specified in the TileJSON).

Not sure if the per-zoom tile data also plays a role per se, but when using circle-based layers for rendering data, it seems that multiple zoom levels are merged versus the exclusive rendering for heatmap or extrusion-based layers. Maybe a separate issue entirely, but I could make an example that illustrates the behavior with circle layers, if it's useful.

@jfirebaugh
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the report! I'm consolidating all the issues related to this bug in #6768.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants