Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

the emoji btn can be placed on the left side and the plugin cant be used on a 'ckeditor5 document' textarea #431

Open
yar-developer opened this issue Mar 31, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@yar-developer
Copy link

hi,

  1. is there a config for placing the emoji btn on the other(left) side of the input (in the direction:rtl page)? the 'pickerPosition' config doesn't work and it doesn't have 'left' value
  2. i didnt find a config for setting the width of the container? is CSS the only way?
  3. is it possible for using it on textarea which already has 'ckeditor 5 document' installed on it? i tried, but it didn't work
@mervick
Copy link
Owner

mervick commented Mar 31, 2021

Hello,

  1. no
  2. css is the only way
  3. no

@yar-developer
Copy link
Author

yar-developer commented Apr 1, 2021

hi, for number 2, if we want to use CSS, the classes that the plugin produces for two textareas are the same, so it will be a little bit difficult to select, do you have any solution?
and for all the 3 issues above, do you have any planning for development? if so, when will the updated version probably be released?
thank you

@mervick
Copy link
Owner

mervick commented Apr 2, 2021

Yes, I was planning to fix this in a future version, but I cannot say when I will.
Therefore, do not hope for a quick fix.

@carpii
Copy link
Contributor

carpii commented Apr 2, 2021

@yar-developer

If you apply a CSS class to the source input or textarea, it gets copied over to the resulting div.emojionearea

You could use this to differentiate..

https://jsfiddle.net/6cjzph3k/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants